14 Jun
Posted by Joel Falconer as Social Media

Social media is a waste of time, you say?
There have been plenty of articles flying around the web this week claiming that social marketing is a waste of time. That’s not what this article is about. I’m talking about the blogger who refreshes Twitter every two seconds while hunting for story leads or the fifteen year old girl who posts pictures of herself in underwear on MySpace (how trashy).
Okay, maybe not so much that last one, but I’m talking about the average user of a social networking, media or bookmarking service. I’m also writing this from the vantage point of someone who generates content on the web on a daily basis, not a fly-by-night surfer.
It’s a pretty common statement: social media is a waste of time. It’s either written on blogs by writers who are vehemently opposed to anything that involves talking openly to others on the web, or from people who are actually on Twitter and come to the realization that seven out of eight of their work day hours are spent tweeting.
Services are inherently just services. Whether a service is a waste of time or not is about how you use it. To answer the question that opens this piece, you have to ask another question:
Do you have a reason for using social media? Or are you just filling in time?
If you don’t have a goal when you open Twitter or Plurk or any of a myriad of these sites, then you’re going to sit there wasting time, waiting for that goal to materialize in your mind. It won’t happen. It’s the same with anything else; setting your intentions is a mental trigger to act. Nature fills a void, so if you don’t have any specific intentions, you’ll naturally want to sit there pretending to be doing something until you figure out what you’re actually meant to be doing.
My best advice: if you don’t have a reason to be tweetin’ you need to log out and get away from it all. But there are useful reasons to log back in.
I bet you didn’t think I was going to list this as a goal. After all, having fun is pretty much the reason these services exist. It’s good to finish a tough article, post it and head over to Twitter to chat and have fun for a while. You cannot be productive without relaxing and rewinding and most importantly, just having fun.
It’s easy to get carried away when you’re having a good time, but if you set time limits in advance you shouldn’t have a hard time sticking to it. If you do, then you’re not ready for this kind of distraction level - go work on your self-discipline!
I’ve met a bunch of people on Twitter. Some have become friends, or have found a place in my feed reader (and I’ve often found a place in theirs) and I’ve managed to get a client or two from the service.
The competition we’re running for the next week (and if you haven’t entered, you should do so now) was largely arranged via Twitter with Dustin Wax and James Chartrand, too.
The same limits that apply to water cooler-style recreation apply to networking, because the lines between the two are pretty blurred and you can end up having some wild, fun and potentially endless conversations with new people.
I get a lot of my visitors from social media. Twitter, StumbleUpon, even a few from Plurk. Furthermore, I don’t spam; you’ve got to log in and make an effort to be part of the community. You can’t just dump a link and leave - that’ll get your followers to ditch you like nothing else.
For content generators, getting visitors to your site is never a waste of time. Fortunately, you shouldn’t need to set a time limit on your promotion - it needs to be done, it can be done really quickly, and it’ll probably be done while you’re in the middle of relaxing and networking anyway.
If you want to catch someone, know what timezone they’re in and what time of day they tend to come online. For instance, in our Twitter conversations, I’ve noticed that James from Men with Pens is online at 8pm in my timezone pretty much every single day. Since he’s such a fun guy, I stick around.
Remember to set your limits and preferably do this when you can give it your full attention for a while. Batching is a popular productivity technique I’ve been using for a while that Darren Rowse of ProBlogger recently wrote a great post on (thanks, Darren, for revitalizing this topic). I suggest batching it in no more than ten-fifteen minute increments.
Batch it, but with several sessions in a day. My American and Canadian friends might contend that I don’t actually do this, but the truth is my hard-sloggin’ work time is when they’re asleep. That way I can spam them when they’re awake ;
Sidenote: Remember the joke about Dustin’s post on writing at Lifehack I made in my link round-up yesterday? He took it seriously - check out this masterpiece! Oh, and go enter the competition.
Did you enjoy this article? Get free updates by RSS or email so you don't miss the next one!
Consider sharing this article with your friends, or submitting it to your favorite social network.
27 Responses
Ming
June 14th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
1my first time here, via twitter..love the design of the blog man..and nice post. (and yeah darren’s post was good too) as a frelancer, twitter gives me a sense of working in an open office, i typically add designers and artsy sorts to follow
since i started using twitter this way, i’ve ever felt that i was working alone:)
Joel Falconer
June 14th, 2008 at 5:07 pm
2Ming, glad to have you here! That’s what I love about Twitter - and also one of the parallels when it comes to productivity: it’s so hard to get work done in an open office when everybody wants to chat :)
Sabina Podjed
June 14th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
3Great post!
“Whether a service is a waste of time or not is about how you use it. ”
The one that have no idea how to use it, are probbably the one that complain the most.
I’m personally not shure I it brings me any good or not. And if Twitter is more an addiction.
But I’m learning. And every day I’m getting better and better at using the social media.
I recomend reading the David Meerman Scott book The New Rules of Marketing a& PR.
James Chartrand - Men with Pens
June 14th, 2008 at 9:32 pm
4Joel, very smart piece. What I liked about you on Twitter was that you were doing everything right - had you read the instruction book? You spoke up with confidence. You weren’t afraid to tap my shoulder and that of other popular probloggers. You get involved in conversations (Even about pitchforks, lemons and coveralls) and gently apply the promotion at the same time (links, gently and not too often).
I agree with the timezone - I know who’s on at what time during the times I can be available (and when I can’t.) Remarkablogger is a noonish guy. Vegaspenman is night. Karenswim is mid morning. Writingjourney, BrettLegree and DaveNavarro are early morning like me.
And now you! Ah, glorious you! My bright new shiny… wonderful. Just remember to tell everyone I discovered you first, hm?
You are using and leveraging social media perfectly. I think I do much the same, only in a more crazy, casual way.
And THAT is social marketing - and THAT works.
Joel Falconer
June 14th, 2008 at 10:14 pm
5@Sabina: Great to here you’re learning new things. I’ll check out the book, thanks!
@James: I wish there was an instruction book, it’d make things a lot easier for a lot of people! For me it was just a few years of trial and error with social media and a lot of volunteer PR work - that adds up to 10% of it. 90% following my gut feeling and observing
Thank you for your kind comments. Glad to know we use social media in similar ways. You’re awesome, James!
Vered
June 15th, 2008 at 2:22 am
6Wow, James REALLY likes you.
I see it as networking in a way that is fun and casual. It is certainly more fun, less stressful, and one could argue more efficient, than networking in a real-life event such as a cocktail party or a formal dinner.
Daniel Smith
June 15th, 2008 at 3:22 am
7Joel,
This is a great article, and one all tweeps should read. My favourite part of the entire post is where you say that services are just services and their inherent value is based on what you make of them (in fact, I’ve used a line very similar in my FF post for your competition - don’t hold it against me!)
I grow sick of all the debate around the blogosphere about what services are time sinks and which ones have true value. Heck, even addictinggames.com might be a useful tool for some if it accomplishes the goal of recreation/relaxation and gives them the energy to burn it up afterwards!
I’m really glad I’ve discovered you blog - keep up the great work. Oh, and btw, it’s funny that Dwax and James are judging your FF contest - without even knowing that, I invited them to become the judges for my Twitter writing contest as well. They shall henceforth be known as a judging force to be reckoned with lol
Daniel Smith
Smithereens Blog: productivity,
persuasion and the art of the written word
Joel Falconer
June 15th, 2008 at 11:25 am
8@Vered: It’s hard not to like me, isn’t it?
You’re right about it being less stressful: if someone makes a tense comment about politics at the table, there’s an awkward silence. At Twitter, everyone just keeps tweetin’ on
@Daniel: Thanks for your promo over at Twitter! Your contest looks great, however, since you’re inadvertently poaching my judges I’ll have to ask you to stop reading my mind before I am forced to wear foil on my head
Just kidding. On your point about the debate: you’re so right. People blame things only when they don’t have the balls to blame themselves.
Marelisa
June 15th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
9Joel: Is the verb “tweeting” (are you sure, because then I’m going to have to change the word “twittering” on a post I wrote)? OK, I’m going to have to open a Twitter account (I think pretty soon I’m going to hit my technology-overload point). And yes, it’s hard not to like you :-)
Joel Falconer
June 15th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
10Marelisa, Twitter vocab for you: tweeting is the verb, tweets are the individual messages, tweeps are people on Twitter, and (this one’s my own) the other verb, to twitter, means to endlessly while away your time talking to people you will most likely never meet
But that doesn’t mean it’s a waste of time!
Marelisa
June 15th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
11Oh, OK, so I can leave “twittering” on my blog post because that’s what I meant: not getting things done because you’re wasting time on an activity that’s getting you nowhere. Thanks for the lingo update. Oh, and I just signed up for twitter. Now I’m going to do some research to try and figure out how to use it.
Joel Falconer
June 15th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
12Marelisa, I suggest grabbing Twhirl or Twitterrific so you don’t have to page refresh your browser all the time. Use the @ symbol combined with someone’s username to direct a message at them, for example:
@Marelisa: Welcome to Twitter. You’re going to regret this.
If they’re following you, they’ll see this in their home feed, otherwise they’ll see it under the Replies tab.
Vered
June 15th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
13“means to endlessly while away your time talking to people you will most likely never meet”.
Ah, but Australia is on my list of places to visit before I die. ;)
Joel Falconer
June 15th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
14Vered, well, if you come, I’ll introduce you to Aussie beer, ‘roo on the barbie, and croc-wrestling. (Here I am reinforcing the stereotypes yet again!)
James Chartrand - Men with Pens
June 15th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
15Wait. Tell me you don’t eat kangaroos…
Joel Falconer
June 15th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
16Every supermarket stocks the stuff. There’s nowhere near as much as there is lamb, beef, pork, chicken, etc, but it’s there. I don’t buy it, but often have it at my in-law’s place. Irony is they aren’t Australian.
Vered
June 15th, 2008 at 2:50 pm
17I’ll try anything once. :)
James Chartrand - Men with Pens
June 15th, 2008 at 7:55 pm
18*cries* Oh the poor things…
I guess it’s no worse than eating deer, moose or caribou. But that’s a shocker. Never saw kangaroos as a food source. lol
Sabina Podjed
June 15th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
19@Marelisa here’s a page with info on twitter applications http://i-stuff.blogspot.com/2008/04/twitter-applications-part-i.html (this is the first part, and there are 7 more).
I like Thwirl that Joel has mentioned, but I have discovered today the TwitterFox as part of Mozilla Firefox that’s offering prity much the same function.
Joel Falconer
June 15th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
20@Vered: I’ll hold you to it!
@James: Farmers consider them a pest, since they destroy export crops. Not that anyone would give a toss if it were just non-export crops. The taste is too gamey for my liking.
@Sabina: Twhirl is great, though the scrolling could be smoother. Twitterrific is great if you’re on OS X. Flock is my browser of choice, but the inbuilt Twitter functionality is not to my liking at all.
Marelisa
June 16th, 2008 at 1:51 am
21@Sabina: I’m going to go visit the link you suggest above, thank you.
Shilpan | successsoul.com
June 16th, 2008 at 4:55 am
22Joel -
Excellent post. I’m still learning social media so this article is invaluable when and if I consider twittering. For now, I enjoy Stumble. I also like Digg but it has become increasingly fierce to make it to the front page. Oh! comments on Digg are obnoxious by any means. Look at my last post, http://www.dumblittleman.com/2008/06/seven-habits-of-losers-are-your-buddies.html, at the Dumb Little Man. Readers have taken entirely different view of what I’m trying to get across. Shilpan
Pierre-Philippe Martin
June 16th, 2008 at 12:14 pm
23Interesting post, thanks. I just subscribed to your RSS feed and will look you up on Twitter.
Joel Falconer
June 16th, 2008 at 2:56 pm
24@Shilpan: StumbleUpon is good. Twitter is more about interpersonal relationships, though, which is why I enjoy it so much. And Digg traffic… well, undue pressure on your server and the bulk of their users are little kids who haven’t seen the outside world in a few years. There are some good users there, of course.
@Pierre-Phillippe: Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it. Loved the map of America on your blog, by the way.
Mark Abucayon
June 19th, 2008 at 11:35 am
25Twitter looks nice, In fact I used it and I love the features of the website.
It only tells what u do and of course to be acknowledge in the web one reason is that. BTW your post give me lots of idea. Thanks for sharing this one.
The Blurry Line Between Online and Real-Life Relationships | MomGrind
August 4th, 2008 at 6:24 am
26[…] used to be a BIG skeptic, but Twitter is a great tool for networking and for keeping in touch. In fact, since none of my real-life friends uses Twitter, […]
Robert
November 17th, 2008 at 10:20 am
27There’s a voting about this topic on http://isusingtwitternothingmorethanawasteoftime.com
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Archives
Links
Tumblelog
Meta
Joel Falconer is a freelance writer and a recording and performing musician. He is a Contributing Editor at Top 50 blog Stepcase Lifehack.
Calendar
Copyright © Joel Falconer. Some Rights Reserved. Joel Falconer is powered by WordPress. Layout adapted from Design Disease's Blogging Pro theme. Read our Privacy Policy.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.