Here’s an interesting thought to consider: how important is good, up-to-date technology to doing good work?
I think that if you tell yourself you need a certain computer before you can start a project, you’re a) kidding yourself and b) never going to start. The computer industry is designed in such a way that you are never content with what you have, because your up-to-date technology is never up-to-date for long.
I considered mentioning a few exceptions where you do need up-to-date technology to get the job done. I thought through the list: animation, music… Hmm. Then I realized there are no exceptions, unless you create them; I recorded over 250 demo recordings over the span of two years on an underpowered Mac mini without any decent audio equipment and not a lot of storage space, and before I went Mac, a very old PC that could barely run Adobe Audition (which, by the way, no self-respecting musician uses).
But this isn’t about whether you need technology to do good work, because you don’t. This is about whether updated technology is an important factor in determining how well and how quickly you can do work.
As a writer at one of the web’s most popular productivity blogs, I am seeing this attitude more and more:
People are obsessed with the notion that better technology will get more of your stuff done. That’s stupid! Technology is distracting and makes us less productive. Cut my internet cable and give me Lotus Agenda*!
*Which I am not knocking, partially because I have never used it. Partially because there are some very tech-savvy people who I respect a lot that think it’s great. Hi, dad!
You probably expect me to nod along with this group of people who hate new technology, especially given my rants about digital task lists being bad for productivity (they’re not actually bad, and they can work if you manage them right, but they’re not optimal and productivity is about optimization). I actually think that, while you should never, ever use lack of technology as an excuse to ditch your work, better tech definitely means better work, done faster.
And the list goes on and on.
One of the most famous examples, partly because it’s a fact confirmed by reputable studies, is that more screen space means more productivity. The screen space can come in the form of bigger monitors or more monitors; heck, Al Gore uses three 30” displays chained together and he gets more done in a day than most people do in a month.
There is a growing trend to treat technology like a big interference in our lives, like something that’s not helping us get more done. Like something we should regret ever became an integral part of our lives.
Bullshit. Show me how much you get done if I give you a notepad and pen and cut off your internet connection. Sure, there will be less distractions, but that’s not a problem with technology—that’s a problem with the user’s inability to focus. Distraction is present in every environment.
The fact is that you will get nowhere near as much done. You cannot write as fast as you can type, unless you’re a beginning typist. You cannot access important information or do any form of research anywhere near as quickly, and any in-depth research will probably involve getting in the car and driving. And every minute in the car is more money spent on gas than you’d spend on electricity using your computer all day long.
So the little club of vocal people who are telling us that technology is ruining our productivity need to shut up for a while and reassess. Simple logic seems to indicate the opposite, and if doubling my screen real estate helps me get more done in a day, I’ll be damned if I don’t do exactly that.
Updated technology is definitely important to doing productive work. You don’t need it to do work, but if you want to grab the absolute most out of each day, it’s a huge factor to consider.
Did you enjoy this article? Get free updates by RSS or email so you don't miss the next one!
Consider sharing this article with your friends, or submitting it to your favorite social network.
18 Responses
Writer Dad
August 8th, 2008 at 11:21 pm
1The only thing you NEED is an uncluttered mind. Technology is terrific, but it won’t do the work for you. I’ve fallen into the trap plenty of times. “Oh, if I download that app, I’ll be X times more productive.” No I won’t. I’ll be exactly as productive as I was before, but thirty dollars lighter in my pocket. I do most of my work on a fairly new Macbook which is like my favorite thing in the world. Sometimes I have to work on a seven year old ibook. I get grouchy because it’s super slow and I can practically take a shower in the time it takes to open up a second application. Still, at the end of the day, my words flowed no differently from the dinosaur.
Vered
August 9th, 2008 at 3:42 am
2Very well written. I love it when you speak your mind.
I think it’s fashionable to say that technology is the enemy, so people say it. Of course technology makes us more productive if we use it right. Better technology makes us even more productive. I have a new laptop and it is so much faster than my old one. I have no doubt I’m saving time using this new laptop, and when I need to use Ido’s laptop it totally annoys me that his is so slow.
My only complaint is that I’m not sure we need to be THAT productive. I sometimes think there’s too much emphasis on productivity and not enough on LIVING. But that’s a different subject, and as someone who works 14 hours per day right now, I do realize that you need to maximize productivity as much as possible.
Ramiro Marques
August 9th, 2008 at 4:44 am
3Very well written. I like te way you write.
Bamboo Forest
August 9th, 2008 at 4:51 am
4For what I use my computer for, it’s more than technologically competent. It’s fast enough.
I would agree speed does matter, though. Less time things take to load more time to do whatever it is you want to do. It’s not much more time, but I suppose it does add up. Yes.
I use my computer to blog, surf, stay in touch, and learn. I’ve also been known to watch movies on it.
Marelisa
August 9th, 2008 at 9:15 am
5I think it’s like a bell curve. The more technology you have the more productive you are, up to a point, and then if you add more technology the curve starts to fall. The trick is finding the sweet spot.
Joel Falconer
August 9th, 2008 at 3:22 pm
6Warning! Monster comment ahead.
Writer Dad: definitely agree with you; this isn’t about minimum requirements, or the need aspect. It’s about optimal performance, and I think tech makes the difference between good and optimal, not bad and good. That said, I write for a living, so if my computer took so long to open an app that I could take a shower while I wait, I’d be losing lots of money. My main laptop is an iBook, by the way (a three year old G4 though).
Vered: I spent a lot of time as a kid in churches, where speaking your mind is bad. You’re not allowed to have your own opinion and free speech is not given the proper respect and valued as much as it should be. In that environment, people only say what has been Approved For Public Speech by several committees and at least two theologists, so while my best work comes when I speak my mind, I rarely do it just because that bad programming still lingers around. I’m working on it, though!
As for your second paragraph, I think it depends on which productivity writer you’re talking to. Some want to be more productive so they can do more work. Others want to be more productive so they can spend more time living; I’ve always been in the same camp as you though lately there are those 14 hour days you mentioned.
Ramiro: Thank you!
Bamboo Forest: Yes, it’s all relative to what you need to do. If you’re a writer and all your writing and research tools open quickly and are responsive while you use them, you have “updated technology” in the sense that it’s new enough to handle your needs. Even newer technology can make you more productive by a measurement of seconds or minutes throughout the day — sort of nice to have, but negligible.
The important point is that you should try and get technology that’s new enough to handle what you throw at it; it doesn’t need to be able handle things you’ll never throw at it. Which is why I’ve decided to buy an iMac soon and not a Mac Pro.
Marelisa: Certainly, and it’s a weighted bell curve, too; not just dependent on how much technology you have, but which types of tech. If I buy a computer and a TV, the computer adds productivity points more than the TV ever will. Furthermore—and perhaps most importantly—it’s weighted on usage; if I buy an iPhone, I can save about 15 minutes of the day on the speed it takes me to send text messages over a regular phone or stylus-based PDA. But if I go buy a copy of Crash Bandicoot Nitro Kart for it (and I admit, it was the first app I bought), it reduces the positive weighting of that purchase on the productivity bell curve.
That said, not all technology needs to make you more productive. I think it’s fashionable to say that using technology for entertainment “takes the fun and adventure out of life” but I don’t see any harm in watching a movie or playing a game if that’s more appealing to you than going to some trashy nightclub.
Shilpan | successsoul.com
August 10th, 2008 at 12:14 am
7Joel -
This is a fabulous post. I’m a big fan of simplicity and more technology always adds complexity to things I intend to do IMHO.
One of my heroes, Warren Buffett, has no computer. He is a billionaire and most sought out financial wizard in the world. If he can do his job without a computer, we certainly can at least without the newest computer. Shilpan
Meryl K. Evans
August 11th, 2008 at 10:07 pm
8In the days before 100 different brands of digital cameras, scanners, and other oh my’s — I used to keep up with the latest (new stuff didn’t come up every month or even every six months). But now — we spend more time deciding which we need to get when it’s time for a new one.
I do most of my freelance work on a 3-year-old computer! It works (has some funky things — but when you install and uninstall hundreds of programs, it’s gonna happen). Who wants to think about starting with a new computer, installing all the apps (some I have in boxes and others I’d have to get from online plus upgrade all the ones I have here — thank you, Belarc Adviisor), reorganizing the desktop, on and on.
I did have to replace my laptop. I use the laptop for software reviews as I don’t need my main PC acting up. I do game reviews, so loading them on the laptop takes away the temptation of playing games when I should be working. My previous laptop that my five-year-old inherited couldn’t handle the games’ more demanding requirements.
If it could, then I’d still be using it. No reason to change if the computer works and isn’t noticeably slow.
Using your outdated technology as an excuse not to write or whatever? That’s a new one. Sounds like a procrastinator (unless they’re a game reviewer).
Graham Strong
August 12th, 2008 at 3:35 am
9Technology is a tool, nothing else. If a carpenter gets lost in the shininess of his saw, he’ll get just as much done as the guy playing Bejeweled on the Internet.
As for “new” technology: is Widget 3.025 that much better than Widget 3.02? Usually not. Although the former is “newer”, it might actually be more productive to avoid upgrading until 3.1 comes out…
If you get too obsessed with the newest thing, you’ll start working for the technology instead of vice versa. ~Graham
Vered
August 15th, 2008 at 9:52 am
10Umm. Just wanted to pop in here for a second to say that I MISS YOUR POSTS. I know you’re busy, so take your time - my feed reader will let me know when there’s a new post. But I am still allowed to miss you, right?
I grew up in a Jewish orthodox home and went to a religious school. My parents weren’t very strict, but my teachers were. I know exactly what you mean when you talk about free speech. It doesn’t seem to exist in a religious environment. I think they are scared that people would actually start to THINK FOR THEMSELVES.
Links: 2008-08-15 | Meryl.net
August 15th, 2008 at 10:08 pm
11[…] Is Updated Technology Important to Productive Work? Unless you’re a designer using resource demanding software, a software reviewer (then I recommend installing and using them on a secondary computer instead of your main one), or using a 10-year-old computer — then this sounds like another excuse from a procrastinator. […]
Joel Falconer
August 17th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
12Aww, Vered, I’m sorry!
I’ll try and get something together soon. I’ve been so swamped with jobs lately. Most freelancers would call that a fantastic problem to have, but it sure does get stressful and time-consuming.
Vered
August 21st, 2008 at 7:02 am
13Nah, I know you’re busy.
Take your time - my feed reader will let me know when you post something.
It IS a fantastic, even if stressful, situation to be in. I’m happy for you.
Barbara Ling
September 3rd, 2008 at 12:19 am
14I love technology so long as it enhances my ability to work (long live VI!
). I’ll confess…I’m not an early adopter (as I much prefer my tech to be stable) but hey, things that make my life easier are very good thingees indeed.
Profoundity, thy name is me.
Great post, btw - thanks for sharing! Barbara
Andre Kibbe
September 3rd, 2008 at 4:08 am
15I recorded over 250 demo recordings over the span of two years on an underpowered Mac mini without any decent audio equipment and not a lot of storage space, and before I went Mac, a very old PC that could barely run Adobe Audition (which, by the way, no self-respecting musician uses).
As you’ve demonstrated, musicianship remains the killer app.
Show me how much you get done if I give you a notepad and pen and cut off your internet connection. Sure, there will be less distractions, but that’s not a problem with technology—that’s a problem with the user’s inability to focus. Distraction is present in every environment.
But internal distractions are there even in the face of external distractions. One of the problems with having an information buffet at your fingertips is that external distractions can hide internal ones. More information resources provide more foxholes to hide from the existential issues that undermine the user’s ability to focus.
I actually write much faster offline than online. I was using an Alphasmart Neo — a dedicate word processor with a 6-line monochrome LCD, text-only screen. The only problem is that as a blogger I have to do much more than write. I have to network with other bloggers, do research, install plugins, do theme modifications, etc. I decided to stop fighting the internet and start moving all of my work to the cloud. I handle the contingency, “But what if I have no internet connection?” by reframing how I understand my @Computer list. My new rule is simple: no internet = no computer.
You cannot write as fast as you can type, unless you’re a beginning typist.
Ray Bradbury once boasted that if you gave him a legal pad and anyone else the gear of his choice, he could out-create that person after an hour’s time.
I can type 80 wpm, but I can’t compose anywhere near that fast. It sounds weird, but I spend most of my writing session silently groping for the right words; then I get each passage down in a burst of typing. Some writers have a more conversational mindset. They can simply transcribe what they’re thinking in real time. That doesn’t work for me.
Despite my faster typing speed, I compose much faster longhand. There’s a motivational feedback loop that happens when I write on a legal pad that’s nonexistent when I type. When I see a couple of pages of what I recognize as my handwriting, I “know” I’ve accomplished something in a deeper way than if I had written the same amount of text on a computer with Times Roman. It’s like the difference between jogging on the street and jogging on a treadmill. When you’ve run on the street, you have a kinesthetic sense of the distance you’ve covered.
Tech Ted
September 11th, 2008 at 1:01 am
16Wishing and getting are at opposite ends of the spectrum in recession times. Love to have but perhaps it should be make do with?
Greg Kaszynski
October 1st, 2008 at 7:40 am
17Nice thinking Joel
As to computational power, it seems to be mostly personal ego these days, pretty much like OS stuff but with less “religion” involved.
Just a quick take, from what I did for some years
One -define the task
Two -find the software that can accomplish this (with a little “more” room)
Three -get the hardware/OS that will allow the SW to operate easily.
Just a rough guess, but I’d say bizillions of CPU cycles are waiting for some human touch (input)
Happy Trails Greg
Melissa Donovan
October 2nd, 2008 at 5:34 pm
18It all comes down to making smart choices, doesn’t it? Some of the latest gadgets and productivity tools won’t change a thing while others can really help you get more done. The trick is knowing what’s worth the investment and trouble. I’ve tried a few apps that promised to simplify my life and they ended up complicating my workflow. Others, (like my shiny, new MacBook Pro) helped me work faster and become more mobile.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Archives
Links
Tumblelog
Meta
Joel Falconer is a freelance writer and a recording and performing musician. He is a Contributing Editor at Top 50 blog Stepcase Lifehack.
Calendar
Copyright © Joel Falconer. Some Rights Reserved. Joel Falconer is powered by WordPress. Layout adapted from Design Disease's Blogging Pro theme. Read our Privacy Policy.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.